survey reply from Judy Fiske, 1st Ward

1    Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

Because countering climate change and achieving sustainability are essential to life itself, I believe these goals should be among the highest short- and long-term priorities for Evanston, the region, the country and the world.

2.   What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November? What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

From the city’s perspective, the most important initiatives are the ones we can undertake immediately, especially those that increase efficiency in city buildings and services while using less paper and reducing other forms of waste. A little leadership goes a long way; I helped organize a group of volunteers to help recycle waste from our block on Davis Street, and leadership of this type will be key to the Plan’s success.

The biggest challenge, though, will be identifying funding sources. I remain focused on restoring Evanston’s fiscal viability, which will create new opportunities for us to control our own destiny – literally – in this area. In the interim, new federal programs must be actively pursued so we can start moving with greater urgency toward achieving these goals.

3.   What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

City government and elected representatives should lead by example. We should be using efficient, well-maintained vehicles. We should be constructing healthy, well-insulated buildings. We should be issuing RFPs for high-quality infrastructure projects, not quick fixes. We should be considering adaptive reuse programs, not thoughtless demolition. We should be moving increasingly toward paperless communication and record-keeping. We must coordinate with Pace, the CTA and Northwestern University to develop a more efficient transportation system. These aren’t just “green dreams.” I have been a public advocate for such programs for years and I will continue to do so as 1st Ward alderman. Indeed, my retail store in downtown Evanston makes recycling and 100% biodegradable and organic pet products available to our customers on a daily basis, even though it costs us more to do so. In short, I practice what I preach.

4.   What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I support the highest levels of LEED certification for new construction.

survey reply from Cheryl Wollin, 1st ward (I)

1. Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities a major issues facing Evanston?

I strongly supported the Mayor’s signing on to the Kyoto protocol and voted enthusiastically to accept the Evanston Climate Plan.

This was a major achievement that put Evanston out front in the efforts of sustainability.  With 200+ strategies, there are steps that everyone can achieve.   As a founding member of “Keep Evanston Beautiful” in 1981, I have always promoted and worked for curbside recycling and environmental efforts in our city (such as using recycled paper in city materials!).  I will continue to look for citywide efforts to improve energy efficiency and lower our carbon footprint.  Our first “green alleys” are a great step forward in making a reality out of good ideas, and I was proud to vote for them.

2. What are the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?  What are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goals?

I proudly wore my -13%/2012 button to a conference of the National League of Cities last November.  When elected officials from other cities asked about it, I explained how a dedicated group of citizens and staff, comprised of nine task forces, tackled the problem of how to affect climate change in our city.  While there, I also went to Ald. Moore’s presentation of Chicago’s Climate Action Plan.

The initiatives that result in energy efficiency in city buildings (and education residents as well) will have great influence and could even save the city money. Changing light bulbs, buying energy-efficient equipment (Evanston bought its first hybrid vehicle!) can make change possible. Transportation—and our multi-modal plan—will encourage Evanstonians to explore alternative means of getting around town.  The biggest challenge is to change people’s lifestyles and expectations.  Walking more, bicycling, using public transportation—instead of jumping in the car—will take focused effort.  But we have a great city for public transit and a beautiful lakefront for bike riding, so we’re already ahead of the game.

3.      What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City Government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

Carolyn Collopy as the city’s sustainability coordinator has been doing an excellent job working with other city departments on ways to do their jobs in a more energy efficient way.  She has also reached out to the community (in addition to leading the plan itself) to bring new ideas and strategies through workshops, forums, ecology center events, etc.

The city built the new Fire Station #5 with sustainable building practices, and the remodeling of the offices at the water treatment plant reflected excellent examples of sustainable construction practices.  City leadership in government buildings should be a model of good practices.  We have done this, and will continue do so.

4.      What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I support requiring LEED certification for larger, new buildings (and encouraging it for smaller businesses).  We should also encourage new residential buildings to explore sustainable building practices.  One way the city can do that is to provide resources for homeowners who are doing renovations, such as listing vendors who specialize in energy efficient materials and practices.

survey reply from Elliott Dudnik, 4th Ward

1. Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank
among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?
While I deeply believe that achieving a reduction an overall reduction in energy
consumption, a shift toward preserving natural resources and the use of renewable
materials are all critical, not only for Evanston, but for the United States and the
developed and developing world, present economic conditions may force us to
consider how to achieve these goals as well as a shift toward a more sustainable
future.

What I have already come to realize, as will be discussed further below, is that the
goals of achieving sustainability, controlled and better use of resources and/or energy
conservation will not be accomplished when local priorities may be focused upon
providing needed or critical services.

While it may be argues that the cost of providing and maintaining water, sewers,
streets and other utilities or services does can be reduced as we reduce our
consumption, eliminate waste, redesign our environment and reorient our way of
travelling and consuming, city’s such as Evanston, must still respond to immediate
needs and conditions, as well as to allocation of available funds and other resources.
Thus, while goals such as the Evanston Climate Plan can be shown to save scarce
funds and to impact local economies, the costs of certain strategies come with a cost
that might not be readily implemented in the near future. As Alderman, my priorities
would be to direct implementation of as many strategies as can be incorporated into
city operations and those of the business and private communities as are feasible and
which might not be viewed as negatively impacting other programs or economic
activities.

This may, in the short-run, mean that more emphasis will have to be focused upon
education of both public and private sector, efforts directed at behavior modification
as it relates to travel (automobile versus public transport or bike travel for work and
recreation), energy conservation (natural and artificial lighting, heating and cooling),
and resource management (recycling and more efficient and proper material usage),
rather than on programs that might entail expenditure of fiscal resources to achieve
other specific goals.

However, in the long-run these initial efforts, particularly if seen not require use of
limited funds, will have an important effect upon future thinking, planning, resource
usage, as well as expenditures, as the entire city comes to recognize how even limited
change in behavior and action can result in positive environmental results.

2. What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston
Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November? What do you
think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of
reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?
Under present conditions, it would be most appropriate and strategic to seek to focus
upon those initiatives contained in the ECAP that can be achieved with limited
resource allocation and which can be implemented as an ongoing process. These
would include efforts and reducing emissions that are an outgrowth of electric and
gas utilization in public and private sectors and for both commercial and residential
users. Given that added incentives may now be available for increased weatherization
and other conservation measures including insulation and window or door
replacement, there may be an increased effort to make needed changes. Furthermore,
since relamping and a change to CFL (or even LED) lamps, reprogramming or
resetting of thermostats - both summer and winter, or planting and other passive
strategies can be implemented with little cost a substantial portion of the goal can be
achieved, especially since incandescent lamps require replacement, roofs are replaced
or landscaping added in the course of any building life-cycle. Similarly, increased
patterns and efforts at waste reduction and recycling of both household and
commercial waste requires more emphasis on education and changes in attitude than
physical expenditure is would, when coupled with energy efficiency, result in more
than 80% of the stated goal.

I have emphasized to of the several basic strategies because, as noted earlier, they will
not result in a need for major financial resource expenditure on the part of City
government and very little cost not ordinarily expended by the public sector as part of
their “ordinary” activities, repair or maintenance. This appears important because it
would serve to offset any resistance to major capital spending that might otherwise be
rejected when other programs and services are threatened – regardless of the
importance of achieving these goals.

This latter point, is of coursed, the greatest challenge toward achieving the overall
goal by 2012. The downturn in the economy, which has not improved since last
November, means that most governmental bodies as well as most businesses and
households will be reluctant to make changes or implement strategies that they may
not be able to afford. Since we cannot foresee how the latest and any future Federal
Economic Stimulus Plan might provide funds for more significant and immediate
action to achieve these goals, If, for many business and families the focus may
become remaining operational or keeping their home, any program that appears to
require expenditure above-and-beyond daily necessities and operations, will not be
viewed kindly. Educating these groups to demonstrate that minor changes in behavior
will, in fact, reduce their costs and increase their overall well-being will become a
secondary challenge in addition to actual implementation of the associated strategies.

3. What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing
greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the
resources of City government and your office to promote implementation of
the Climate Action Plan?

City government has several roles in seeking to reduce GHG emissions. First, and
foremost, the city must lead by example and implement as many of the strategies as it
can afford throughout all buildings and operations. This, as noted, above, may not be
easily achieved given the potential that funding is not available (witness the delicate
balancing act performed during the process of budget adoption). Thus, it would
require dependence upon potential Federal funds that might now be forthcoming for
some programs and a change in priorities for other programs and services in the
immediate future as subsequent budget and each new Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) is formulated.

Secondly, the City must play a prominent role in educating the public and providing
information to the business and residential community of where and how they might
gain financially as reductions are achieved, both in reduced costs, improved life-style
or new economic opportunities. Enforcement of codes and other regulations that
control waste and use of materials or of fuels, is also a role for government> In
addition, ongoing actions that occur on a regular basis, such as relamping to more
efficient fixtures and lamps, equipment upgrades to more efficient devices, change or
control of vehicle usage and the types and efficiencies of vehicles that replace
existing vehicles all will have a demonstrable effect on citizen behavior and
perception, as well as actual costs and the overall goals of such programs. .
As Alderman, I would press for specific priorities for the implementation of those
strategies that can demonstrate immediate viability and efficacy and can produce
measurable results. When such programs can be shown to achieve such results, they
would prove an incentive for both other City actions and to the citizens that they too
should join in similar efforts with the potential for similar or even greater results.

4. What is your position on the Evanston Environment board’s proposed
legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I personally have a long history of interest and experience with matters of resource
and energy conservation dating back to the design of the first recycling center in the
City of Chicago, the Hyde Park- Kenwood Recycling Center in 1971, through many
years of teaching energy-conscious design at the UIC School of Architecture,
participation in energy-conscious teacher’s seminars and in my own practice. At
present, I am in the process of designing what might be Evanston’s second public
LEED project (after Fire Station #5), the expansion and renovation of the Animal
Shelter. As a consequence, many of the issues faced in seeking and obtaining LEED
certification are not new to me and others who have addressed them for year,
although they have now been, appropriately combined to address overall matters and
concerns as to global sustainability, resource utilization and environmental quality

Under present conditions, it would be most appropriate and strategic to seek to focus
upon those initiatives contained in the ECAP that can be achieved with limited
resource allocation and which can be implemented as an ongoing process. These
would include efforts and reducing emissions that are an outgrowth of electric and
gas utilization in public and private sectors and for both commercial and residential
users. Given that added incentives may now be available for increased weatherization
and other conservation measures including insulation and window or door
replacement, there may be an increased effort to make needed changes. Furthermore,
since relamping and a change to CFL (or even LED) lamps, reprogramming or
resetting of thermostats - both summer and winter, or planting and other passive
strategies can be implemented with little cost a substantial portion of the goal can be
achieved, especially since incandescent lamps require replacement, roofs are replaced
or landscaping added in the course of any building life-cycle. Similarly, increased
patterns and efforts at waste reduction and recycling of both household and
commercial waste requires more emphasis on education and changes in attitude than
physical expenditure is would, when coupled with energy efficiency, result in more
than 80% of the stated goal.
I have emphasized to of the several basic strategies because, as noted earlier, they will
not result in a need for major financial resource expenditure on the part of City
government and very little cost not ordinarily expended by the public sector as part of
their “ordinary” activities, repair or maintenance. This appears important because it
would serve to offset any resistance to major capital spending that might otherwise be
rejected when other programs and services are threatened – regardless of the
importance of achieving these goals.
This latter point, is of coursed, the greatest challenge toward achieving the overall
goal by 2012. The downturn in the economy, which has not improved since last
November, means that most governmental bodies as well as most businesses and
households will be reluctant to make changes or implement strategies that they may
not be able to afford. Since we cannot foresee how the latest and any future Federal
Economic Stimulus Plan might provide funds for more significant and immediate
action to achieve these goals, If, for many business and families the focus may
become remaining operational or keeping their home, any program that appears to
require expenditure above-and-beyond daily necessities and operations, will not be
viewed kindly. Educating these groups to demonstrate that minor changes in behavior
will, in fact, reduce their costs and increase their overall well-being will become a
secondary challenge in addition to actual implementation of the associated strategies.
3. What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing
greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the
resources of City government and your office to promote implementation of
the Climate Action Plan?
City government has several roles in seeking to reduce GHG emissions. First, and
foremost, the city must lead by example and implement as many of the strategies as it
can afford throughout all buildings and operations. This, as noted, above, may not be
easily achieved given the potential that funding is not available (witness the delicate
balancing act performed during the process of budget adoption). Thus, it would
require dependence upon potential Federal funds that might now be forthcoming for
some programs and a change in priorities for other programs and services in the
immediate future as subsequent budget and each new Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) is formulated.
Secondly, the City must play a prominent role in educating the public and providing
information to the business and residential community of where and how they might
gain financially as reductions are achieved, both in reduced costs, improved life-style
or new economic opportunities. Enforcement of codes and other regulations that
control waste and use of materials or of fuels, is also a role for government> In
addition, ongoing actions that occur on a regular basis, such as relamping to more
efficient fixtures and lamps, equipment upgrades to more efficient devices, change or
control of vehicle usage and the types and efficiencies of vehicles that replace
existing vehicles all will have a demonstrable effect on citizen behavior and
perception, as well as actual costs and the overall goals of such programs. .
As Alderman, I would press for specific priorities for the implementation of those
strategies that can demonstrate immediate viability and efficacy and can produce
measurable results. When such programs can be shown to achieve such results, they
would prove an incentive for both other City actions and to the citizens that they too
should join in similar efforts with the potential for similar or even greater results.
4. What is your position on the Evanston Environment board’s proposed
legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?
I personally have a long history of interest and experience with matters of resource
and energy conservation dating back to the design of the first recycling center in the
City of Chicago, the Hyde Park- Kenwood Recycling Center in 1971, through many
years of teaching energy-conscious design at the UIC School of Architecture,
participation in energy-conscious teacher’s seminars and in my own practice. At
present, I am in the process of designing what might be Evanston’s second public
LEED project (after Fire Station #5), the expansion and renovation of the Animal
Shelter. As a consequence, many of the issues faced in seeking and obtaining LEED
certification are not new to me and others who have addressed them for year,
although they have now been, appropriately combined to address overall matters and
concerns as to global sustainability, resource utilization and environmental quality
rather than focus on one or two of specific issues, i.e., energy conservation, reuse and

proper allocation of resource.
With that in mind, my concern as to mandating LEED certification is tempered by
concern as to whether this may, at present, inhibit or reduce the changes sought
because of the manner in which projects are funded or financed in both public and
private sectors and the structure of the taxation system that does not reward long-term
savings over short-term profits. While numerous studies have shown a long-term
savings in dollars and overall environmental benefits when principles of LEED and
other similar strategies are applied, the initial costs of building are higher. As a
consequence, developers not intent on holding their properties for any extended
period have minimal interest in increasing initial costs and associated financing
expenses, even if subsequent owners might benefit. Even subsequent owners are
asked to pay that added cost when purchasing and must weight the benefits against
their anticipated length of ownership. Either added costs for LEED or other
equivalent construction methods and attitudes must be balanced by other changes in
the construction, or they will affect other elements of the project.
In the public sector, the attitude is different since, under most scenarios, the
ownership of the project is stable and the outlook should be for the long-term.
However, when funds are limited and the public expects or mandates that each and
every project be restrained within a fixed budget, the problems are no different. If the
life of a building or project is as long as thirty years and if the “payback” in reduced
operating costs may take as long to achieve, then short-term expediency reduces the
incentive for LEED construction. Thus, the argument for LEED-certification must be
expanded beyond operating cost savings to the overall “greater good” for the
community in terms of quality of life, improvements in water and air quality and in
the overall environment rather than just reduction in fossil-fuel consumption,
production of building materials in lieu of their reuse, reduction of materials entering
the waste stream or other more easily quantified and measurable or visible factors.
This may not be easy since, as I am already discovering, while I believe we can earn
even more than minimal LEED certification in the case of the Evanston Animal
Shelter, the potential added “up- front” project cost to achieve LEED certification
coupled with the multiplier that other mandated programs, e.g., M/W/EBE and
minimal Evanston Resident Workforce, add to that cost, threatens to eliminate this
goal from the project given that no added available funds exist and the budget, even
though we have already reduced the program footprint by more than 10% is in danger
of being exceeded.
Whether in the public or private sector, mandating LEED certification should not be
applied on a “blanket basis” to each project without some recognition of the type of
project, the scale of project or even the long- and short-term operation and use of that
project. Thus, it might be more appropriate, as others have done, to provide
“incentives” for LEED certified projects that have the initial effect to offset the
greater initial construction costs, thus striking a balance that would induce the
builder-owner-developer or agency to take this route. Such strategies or incentives
could or should be in the form of reduced or waived permit fees, reduced property tax
assessments, specific bonuses or waivers from certain zoning restriction, or

fferential utility rates (especially those that the municipality can control such as
water and sewer).
Mandated certification needs to be imposed, if at all, on a graduated basis with, as
noted above, consideration as to such factors as building use or occupancy, scale of
project, or whether renovation or new, particularly given the likelihood that new
construction may be deferred or reduced over the next five or more years and that
efforts to achieve many of the environmental goals sough in the Evanston Climate
Action Plan, while less dependant upon major LEED-based construction, will have to
come from renovation or rehabilitation. We should not discourage any construction
by raising the barrier since most codes, witness the new standards of the International
Building Code, have requirements that mandate many of the elements that might be
included in a LEED-certified building.

survey reply from Donald Wilson, 4th Ward

1.  Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/ problems facing Evanston?

These are top priorities for me.  I have consistently promoted the fact that financial responsibility and economic development require immediate attention, however, environmental impact is a necessary component of those issues.  In making decisions, our strategies and planning must incorporate the principles of sustainable growth and must take environmental and social impact into account.  My goal is to work toward building the Evanston community.  Diligent financial management is required to do the things we need to do.  We already have neighborhoods where people know each other and can enjoy a “walk to everything” lifestyle.  To improve upon that, we need to plan and implement our strategies carefully to ensure that everyone does enjoy this kind of lifestyle, regardless of which neighborhood you live in, regardless of your age and regardless of any physical limitations that you may have.

2.  What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?
What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

There are many important aspects, but to me, the most important immediate initiatives are the support of high performing, transit oriented development, in conjunction with Multi-Modal Transportation Plan.While there are the inherent challenges of changing the behavior of the population in general and as well as infrastructure costs, there are additional challenges in achieving the goals presented by the trends toward increased density outside the transportation corridors, and trends toward the loss of open space.  The initiatives in the Climate Action Plan will directly address these challenges.  By improving the transportation coordination, driving will not be the easiest alternative.  Further, by making mixed use development, in conjunction with economic development initiatives to bring and keep businesses in Evanston, we can create a stronger “walking” and “cycling” culture, as well as improve the use of public transportation.  Reliance on automobiles will be greatly reduced, with the added benefit of improving the health and fitness of the population.

3.  What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?
The City should have these initiatives in mind in all of its decisions. Community awareness should be promoted at every opportunity.  I would encourage neighborhood groups and schools to partner in the City’s efforts by sponsoring community events that highlight the successes of initiatives and that demonstrate the ease with which individuals can modify their routines to implement the day- to-day changes in behavior that make a significant collective impact.

Stronger energy conservation codes could be adopted as part of the building code to ensure a higher level of performance of new or rehabilitated structures.I would also support incentives for projects, construction or other non-construction related programs that achieve certain benchmarks, such as LEED certification or locally produced food that work toward meeting Plan objectives.  Programs such as Chicago’s Green Permit Program provide a streamlined permit application process, as well as partial waivers of otherwise necessary permit review fees.  Evanston should look to other communities for additional ideas and strive to develop its own incentive programs.

4.  What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?
I support certification for public buildings and I do strongly support incentives for projects that meet certification requirements.  I believe that, while not all new construction must be required to be LEED certified at this point in time, projects that demonstrate an obvious or clear disregard for the public policy set forth in the Plan should be discouraged.  I do support energy conservation codes and I do strongly support adaptive reuse of existing buildings as opposed to tear downs, and I support incentives for such projects that improve the performance of such buildings.

Survey reply from Howard Hartenstein, Ward 4

1. Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

I think this problem is bigger than Evanston. Therefore it is incumbent on Evanston and Evanstonians to do their part. Ideally, we would be a leader in addressing what might well be the most pressing issue of our times. Being progressive to me means being creative in developing ways of balancing fiscal concerns with environmental ones. For instance, it may be better at times to promote energy conservation over alternative fuels use. These things are not mutally exclusive, but proper prioritization can lead to greater benefits.

2.  What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?  What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

I think the two most important/achievable areas of the plan deal with alternative energy use for City Fleet vehicles and buildings. Both of the things are within the control of the City and can have an immediate impact. The biggest challenge is changing individual citizen behavior patterns. To accomplish this, we must provide education demonstating how the initiatives are in the best (self) interest of each individual.

3.  What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

It is very difficult for local governments to control things like Greenhouse Gas Emmissions. Instead, it is often more effective to incentivize citizens, businesses, developers, etc. to help achieve civic goals. This does not mean that pressure should not be applied where possible, but it is often more effective to use the carrot rather than the stick.

4. What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

As a LEED Accredited Professional myself, I am in favor of requiring new buildings to be LEED Certified. It is important to remember, however, that LEED Certification is not a panacea for solving all the sustainable issues currently facing our built environment. We need to do all we can to reward buildings that minimize energy use improve our environment regardless of LEED Certification.

survey reply from Delores Holmes, 5th Ward (I)

1. I rank both as priorities probably in the second tier of my priorities.
2. I believe that all of the initiatives are important I haven’t put them in any order.  I think that education, engagement, communication and public relations are the biggest challenges.  We have to find a way to get the attention of all of the residents and educate them so we can all help save the planet.
3. I think the roles of educating and advocating are appropriate ones of the City.  With the help of the Sustainable Programs Coordinator I can be another voice of support in the Ward and the overall community.
4. I am in support of the proposal, however, I do have some concerns about cost.

survey reply from Mark Sloane, 6th Ward

1.       Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

Countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank high on my priorities as major issues not only facing Evanston, but our Country and the World.  Although we will have an impact here in Evanston, the biggest gains will be achieved at the State and Federal levels.  “While the City has a key role to play as a strategic partner, catalyst and advocate for the implementation of the Evanston Climate Action Plan, the success of our efforts to take action on climate change depends largely on the involvement of Evanston institutions, businesses and residents.”  Additionally, I will use my position as Alderman to lobby our representatives and push forward the sustainability and countering climate change agenda, as well as doing things locally as outlined below.

2.      What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?  What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

The most important and realistic initiatives are in Energy Efficiency and Waste Reduction and Recycling.  In an economy that is tremendously strained, items that save money and/or cost minimally will be the most realistic to achieve.  Reducing electric and gas use via conservation and efficiencies contribute to a win-win solution that in this economy is where the greatest achievements will occur.  Transportation is another simple/cost effective means to achieve.  We need to have a community-wide discussion on the benefits of mass transportation and our desire to promote it.  This will include the review and abolishment of transit no parking zones in residential areas.  We must be creative in solving the parking issue, but it must be solved.

The biggest challenges will be in the finance and appearance areas.  Funding off-shore wind turbines will not be an easy investment to obtain.  There sight offshore will also cause issues with those who want to keep the lake pristine.  This, though, is a perfect opportunity to partner with Northwestern and jointly develop out of the box solutions.  One of which could be the harvesting of the surf as a source of energy.

3.      What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

The City needs to act as an advocate as well as a coordinator and implementer.  The City needs to make the investment in recycling bins for all residents.  The current orange boxes de-motivate people as once they are full, additional recycling ends up scattered throughout the alley.  Rather than have to clean the alley, many just throw this stuff away.  Larger trash bin sized containers provide a simple solution to increasing recycling.

The City also needs to act as a coordinator of communication, sharing new technology and efficiencies with its residents.  I’ve committed to quarterly Ward meeting where information can be shared.  The City’s newsletter and website are perfect sites to share information as well.

We also need to advocate for increased dependable rapid transit.  There should be reliable, consistent, dependable mass transportation from Northwest Evanston into Downtown Evanston.  More would be interested in taking “the bus to the movies” if we knew we could count on the system.

Using my office to lobby RTA, communicate with residents and implement local changes will help move forward the Climate Action Plan.

4.      What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I believe LEED certification should be required on all new commercial/substantially sized new construction.  Developers need to understand that it is a requirement of this community, like the affordable housing ordinance, to have LEED certified new construction.  No bonus height is given for this.  It is a community mandate to have LEED certified new construction.

survey reply from Mark Tendam, Ward 6

#1  Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues / problems facing Evanston?

I believe in leading by example. I believe Evanston can be a local as well as national leader in the development and implementation of plans to counter climate change and achieve sustainability. I believe Evanstonians want and will work hard for new and existing environmental programs.

My biggest concern for Evanston is our short- and long-term financial situation. I rank countering climate change and achieving sustainability at the top of our priorities along with maintaining our City’s diversity.

#2  What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted last November? What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

I believe the first priority in the Evanston Climate Action Plan is informing all of our residents about the Plan and generating enthusiasm about it. The ECAP is a thoughtful and well-organized plan. Given our difficult economic times, the most important aspects of the plan are those that have the most immediate “pay-back” for residents making the investment. Those might include improved weatherproofing for homes and businesses and capturing rainwater for lawn use.

The biggest challenges we will face are related to financing the Plan. Stimulus funding will be in demand for many projects. Our best efforts for funding from outside the City will come from putting people to work in these “green” programs.

#3  What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

Our City’s quick approval of the Climate Action Plan and commitment to13% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2012 means that we are off to an excellent start in the effort to implement plans to counter climate change and achieve sustainability. The City should make every effort to facilitate the use of green practices in offices and homes. It should provide inexpensive long-term parking for commuters, consider shuttles to increase interest and ease in public transportation and be diligent in enforcing the existing recycling program while continuing to provide means of disposal for larger, difficult items like electronics, paints and chemicals.

Again, the City has the responsibility to inform the public and create enthusiasm for all of the Plan’s recommendations.

#4  What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I approve of the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings. If requiring LEED standards proves to be a hardship on small developers, a case could be made for waiving some requirements if the importance of the project outweighs the environmental impact.

survey reply from Chistopher Hart, ward 6

Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues / problems facing Evanston?

There are five priority areas I have identified during my campaign for 6th Ward Alderman that can be found on my website – www.hartofthe6thward.com. My positions as they relate to emission reduction goals, community sustainability efforts, and the Climate Action Plan in particular are captured under a broader heading of Transportation, Parking, and Life Safety (agenda topics the incoming 6th Ward Alderman must address). Here is the relevant portion:

Evanston’s Climate Action Plan, adopted by the City Council this past fall, provides a blueprint for reducing the City’s greenhouse gas emissions and represents an initiative under the U.S. Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement. In hard terms, we have agreed to reduce our emissions by 13%, by 2012. The Plan, authored by a completely volunteer City-citizen task force, provides both practical and far-reaching recommendations for achieving this goal. It is an ambitious challenge and one which we must embrace. This cannot be an example of adopting something because it feels right. When we agree to adopt, action must swiftly follow.

A Climate Action Plan, if acted upon, can enhance our economic vitality, as well as our viability as a sustainable, livable City. In this regard, the initiative should become a lens through which your incoming 6th Ward Alderman should consider and promote two important agenda topics in the months ahead:

Demonstrate commitment to the Climate Action Plan by developing a strategic plan to meet the reduction goals. This should be done by defining the short-term/low-cost recommendations that can be acted upon now…in the midst of economic uncertainty. At the same time, the Council needs to define the costs associated with mid-term solutions and undertake planning for long-term initiatives. Above all, the Council needs to immediately ask: How does this impact our fleet management? How does this impact our approval criteria for development? How do we invite learning from other Cities into our conversations?

Determine how to enhance ridership on public transportation, support transit-oriented development, and make commuting to work more convenient and welcoming. Throughout Evanston, there should be no barriers to residents who need to park near transit stations for daily commutes. And, there should be adequate pathways and storage to encourage biking to and from commuting locations.

What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted last November? What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

I believe that the most immediate initiatives include broadening community education and awareness; supporting programs and developments that promote energy efficiency and commuter/public transit use; and, exploring a proposed offshore wind farm.

Within the City of Evanston, we have a wealth of avenues that can and should be levered to broaden community awareness of the individual efforts that can be taken to support a sustainable community. The expectation must be for the City to lead efforts, in collaboration with the City’s larger institutions, and use multiple channels  to promote efficiency programs available through local utilities as well as through State and Federal governmental resources. The effort must start with the City itself serving as a visible model in terms of its own fleet management, the energy efficiencies required for new construction, the demonstrated support behind forestry management, and the public policies communicated to its citizens. In the year ahead, Evanston will have an opportunity to carefully consider the recommendations from the Multi-Modal Transportation Plan and should actively support measures to reduce transportation-related emissions.

The single most significant initiative offered within the Plan is the conceptual thinking behind an offshore wind farm. We must encourage this exploration and recognize that rapid advancements in this field can help overcome the perceived obstacles of today. At some point, we must move beyond an aesthetic, not in my backyard mentality and embrace the strategies necessary to build and sustain a viable long-term community.

What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

vanston holds “environmental sustainability” as a core value. The vision for this area, as articulated within the City’s Strategic Plan, is to be known as “The Green City” and embrace the best ecological practices and policies in our government, services, and infrastructure.

This reference clearly articulates the appropriate role for our City government. As an entity charged with overseeing land use and basic services, the City Council must endeavor to weave sustainability practices into everyday decision-making practice. This is the central concept behind “values-based decision-making”…core values become the context by which decisions are to be made.

In terms of the specific Climate Action Plan, the City government must take a critical next step. It must immediately set targets, demand measurement, and drive accountability. This is so important because, on a higher level, we are at risk of losing invaluable access to this community’s intellectual capital. When our City Council does not act on the considerable efforts of citizens and volunteer thought leaders (whether on Commissions, Committees, or volunteer Task Groups), we put an invaluable resource in jeopardy at a time when we will desperately need to call upon them for service.

What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I would strongly support legislation that leads to LEED-certified “green buildings” for new construction within the City of Evanston and mandates a minimum Sliver rating  requirement for new commercial and institutional projects, including office buildings, high-rise residential buildings, government buildings, and recreational facilities. Penalties for falling short of certification goals should be  defined and enforced.

survey reply from John Zbesko, 7th Ward

1.Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank
among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

While the economic crisis is forcing itself to be the top priority,
environmental issues are a top priority along with other issues under
the umbrella of quality of life in Evanston. Fortunately, many of the
recommendations of the Climate Action Plan make economic sense too. As
alderman, I would prioritize the “low-hanging fruit” or the most easily
implemented recommendations of the Plan.

2.What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston
Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November? What do you
think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of
reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

The City must increase its energy efficiency in heating and air
conditioning by catching up with any deferred maintenance. The capital
improvement budget must include new, more efficient plant and equipment
or insulation and be financed with federal stimulus funds if possible,
and with bonds if not. I would investigate whether the Civic Center’s
aging HVAC could be converted to geothermal.

I believe substantial CO2 and money savings could be achieved if
alternatives to big, heavy gas guzzling police vehicles were explored. I
especially feel that engine idling should be reduced. I wonder if the
City is able to determine the most efficient ways of routing garbage
trucks, snow plows and other City vehicles.

Many cities across the US are trying new approaches to increase
recycling. The purchase of larger bins for residents is an important
first step. I would ask the Director of Parks and Recreation to put out
more trash and recycle drums and make sure they are regularly emptied.
As alderman, I will work to have all the used cooking oil generated by
the many restaurants in Evanston collected and converted to biodiesel. I
strongly feel outsourcing the collection and composting of yard waste
was a mistake and would bring back the free compost available to all
Evanston gardeners. Given the economic crisis, maybe the demand for
community garden space will grow and the City can provide new spaces on
public property. (Maybe the south side of the Civic Center?)

The Climate Action Plan also suggests increased record keeping of
various environmental statistics. I fully support these recommendations
as part of a broader program to track the efficiency and effectiveness
of City services and operations.

The biggest challenge to implementing the Plan is the current economic
crisis, followed by the inertia encountered whenever people are asked to
change their habits. Living “green” is a process, not an end point, and
thus I would concentrate on the easily implemented recommendations and
work from there.

3.What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in
reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would
you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote
implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

First, I see City government as role model. The City should implement
the recommendations that pertain to its operations and publicize its
doing so.

The City government can also use its force of law to shape behavior. For
example, volume pricing of trash collection will certainly decrease the
trash collected and hopefully increase recycling. I support ordinances
to minimize idling by buses, delivery trucks, and taxis. Some
environmental investments, requirements or taxes have a cost to
individuals or taxpayers in general. While I believe Evanstonians place
a premium on a greener environment, I do not know the size of that
premium and so would have to seek the opinion of my constituents before
I voted.

4.What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed
legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I fully support requiring silver LEED certification for large new
building projects. I am also in favor of treating gold or better LEED
certification as a public benefit deserving of a “bonus” for developers.
For homeowner renovations or new 1 to 4 unit construction, I would
support modifying building codes to include standards for insulation or
for the energy efficiency of HVAC or large appliances. Energy audits
should be a standard part of any home inspection.

For City projects, designs should meet gold standards and if not cost
effective or feasible for specific reasons, modified down from the gold
level.

survey reply from Kevin O’Connor, 7th Ward
1. Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

I think they’re of the highest priority. I believe in recycling, conservation of water use, rain barrel use, walking, biking and public transportation in my personal use.

2.  What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?  What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

I think the most important initiatives were reducing auto usage, using more public transportation,  encouraging all citizens, employers and institutions in Evanston to help get the message out . The biggest challenges are making sure the CAP is marketed to all residents and employees in Evanston. Also, due to the macroeconomic environment there will be problems in getting funding for some asapects of the Plan, ie: Will the CTA be able to fund the Eco pass?

3.  What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

First and foremost the City can set the best example by having the City workers reduce car use, stop idling, encourage ride sharing and continue to look for ways for the municipal fleet to uphold best practices with regard to the Plan. The resources of City government and any alderman’s office would be to market the CAP and to lead by example. They say a picture is worth a 1000 words, perhaps at the start of each Council meeting, the Mayor can ask how many citizens, staff and elected officials walked, rode a bike, took public transportation or ride shared. The City also should stop budgeting money to market to the citizens of Evanston for increased water usage. The City needs to find other ways to fill their budget hole. Ald. Tisdahl has also suggested finding more communities to sell water to, this is in direct conflict with the stated intent of the CAP “to reduce water consumption”.

4. What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I support this proposal. I believe the 708 Church Street tower is or will be applying for silver LEED certification when completed.

survey reply from Jane Grover, 7th Ward
1.     Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

Consistent with the City of Evanston’s Strategic Plan and the (draft) Multimodal Transportation Plan, achieving sustainability and countering climate change is a high priority, reflecting this community’s values and my own.  While the City’s stagnant revenues and tight budgets are major issues, sustainability is not incompatible with fiscal responsibility.  Indeed, effective implementation of the Climate Action Plan can generate job growth in Evanston and reduce City expenses related to energy usage and waste.  Consideration of Evanston’s long-future requires sustainability in all aspects of life in Evanston.

2.     What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?  What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

A critical component of the Evanston’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, in compliance with the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement in 2006, will be our initiatives to promote public transportation and alternatives to motor vehicles.  The challenge we must meet is in changing the culture in Evanston so that each person considers and understands the environmental repercussions of his or her actions – choosing to walk or ride rather than drive, to recreate more recycling waste than solid waste, and to limit consumption.  The challenge is in effecting individual change.

3.     What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

The goal of reducing Evanston’s greenhouse gas emissions should be part of every decision made by the City’s elected officials and staff.  Sustainability should guide every deliberation, which necessarily requires innovative thinking about Evanston’s future.  Evanston’s elected officials can play a significant role in educating and informing their constituencies, from insights into the development of sustainability policies, to promoting and sponsoring community events.  The City Council should enact, as soon as practicable, legislation to implement the recommendations and strategies in the Evanston Climate Action Plan.

1. What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I support approval of the proposed legislation to require LEED certification for new buildings.

survey reply from Coleen Burrus, 9th Ward

*  Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

Addressing the challenges involved in climate change and sustainability is an important part of my candidacy.  Encouraging all Evanston stakeholders - elected and appointed officials, residents, businesses, developers, and employers - to take specific steps in reducing their individual and corporate carbon footprints and taking simple sustainable actions are among my priorities when I take office.

It is in the best interest of the City and the 9th Ward to institute the strategies set forth in the Climate Action Plan.  Fostering partnerships with utilities and non-profit organizations, pursuing grants and securing regulatory approvals, and encouraging businesses to “buy into” the Plan can aid in achieving those strategies in a timely manner.

Simply put, sustainability, addressing climate change, and being a responsible steward of our environment are vital for our quality of life in an urban community.  Adopting the Climate Action Plan and signing onto the Kyoto protocols through the U.S. Conference of Mayors were essential actions to show to all stakeholders the City’s commitment to protecting our environment, especially since we enjoy one of the major bodies of water in the world.

* What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November? What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

The most vital initiatives contained in the Climate Action Plan are energy efficiency/buildings and education/engagement.  The strategies, goals, and objectives contained in the energy efficiency/buildings section are key, since they address the private sector directly.  Businesses and employers must be on board for us to meet the MTCO2E emission reduction by 2012, and this section sets out specific, quantifiable objectives for any business or employer to attain.
The education/engagement section is also dramatically important, since “green” ideas must be continually disseminated to our businesses, residents, and employees.  Convening a “green” summit for Evanston’s major employers, having more visible opportunities to remind and instill “green” practices in the lifestyles of our community members, and offering training opportunities for City staff are good ways to keep these issues in the forefront.
The major challenge for achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012 will be the City’s economic condition.  We will need to aim for attaining “low-hanging fruit,” i.e., objectives that can be implemented at little or no cost to City government until our fiscal house is in order and we emerge from this economic recession.

* What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

City of Evanston must lead by example.  City government’s carbon footprint can be reduced greater than 13% by 2012.  By instituting specific action steps to decrease MTCO2E emissions, the City can exceed that benchmark.  Even though we face an enormous budget crisis, the Mayor, City Council, City Manager, and department heads can enact policies and procedures that all employees can meet.

For example, when City vehicles have reached the end of their usefulness, we should purchase hybrid, electric, and natural gas vehicle replacements.  Do we need all City vehicles to seat four or five employees? We should consider Smart cars for “routine” vehicles.

In public safety, we should have more police patrols on bicycles and on foot, not just to have more visible police presence in downtown and in our neighborhoods, but also to decrease our carbon footprint.

We need city staff members in the Community Development Department to have LEED-AP certification.  I’m willing to have funds in future budgets to partially rebate the employees’ costs to attain that certification.  My belief is that LEED-AP is as important for planners to possess as AICP certification.

To better encourage development of LEED-certified projects, the City should review its codes, predominantly its building code and zoning ordinance, to ascertain where “green” development principles can be instituted and strengthened.

The City should install bike lockers adjacent to every CTA stop and Metra station in Evanston.  If a colder climate like Madison, Wisconsin has bike lockers available for their residents and workers, so should we.

Our city leaders, elected and appointed, must sign onto the initiatives contained in the Action Plan.  There are plenty of inexpensive “attitude changes” city officials and employees can undertake to achieve those initiatives.  It is imperative that we change our approach to promoting sustainability to be more proactive.

* What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

In the downtown plan I voted to recommend requiring LEED Silver status as a minimum for new construction in Evanston when developers request an increase to the height limits in the zoning ordinance.  At a minimum LEED Certified status should be required for any new construction throughout Evanston.  I also recommend requiring LEED Silver status for new City buildings.

survey reply from Mimi Peterson, ward 9

1.        Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

Rather than rank ordering priorities for sustainability, I believe it is important to view countering climate change and achieving sustainability through a multi pronged approach that encompasses all that we do, including all the major issues/problems facing Evanston.  When considering the Multi-Modal Transportation Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, changes to the water filtration plant, issuing RFPs, or reviewing requests for PUDs; all of the issues/problems facing Evanston should be viewed through the lens of trying to meet the goals of the ECAP to increase renewable energy and reduce the carbon footprint of our community.

2.        What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November? What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

The most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan are moving towards more renewable energy sources and increasing energy efficiency for existing residential and commercial building stock. The largest challenge to achieving the Plan’s overall goals is how best to achieve the aggressive goal of reduction of GHG by 13% by 2012.  Broader policies, in addition to funding, are needed on a regional, state and national level to help local municipalities achieve their goals.

3.        What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community? How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

Evanston was one of the early adopters of the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement, and Evanston should continue to lead by example into the future with sustainable practices and policies.  As alderman there are three areas of interest that are listed in the ECAP I will pursue using the resources of the City government and the office of alderman to further promote/implement the ECAP.  They are:

1         Improving energy efficiency in residential, commercial and industrial buildings. The greatest need for energy efficiency lies in existing buildings, which create the largest amount of Green House Gas emissions not only in Evanston, but nationwide.  One way to reduce energy consumption is to utilize existing partnerships available, and to grow new connections in Evanston.  Cook County Energy Savers is a project of the Center for Neighborhood Technology which will work with owners of multi unit buildings to help evaluate all the systems in a building, provide a written report, and help implement recommendations for energy efficiency, including access to grants and tax credits for energy conservation.  I will promote using this resource with the goal of making City owned buildings more energy efficient.  I will promote this opportunity on a wider scale, using this existing partnership to reduce the largest portion of GHG emissions in Evanston.

2        Forestry, Prairie and Carbon Offsets

As a concerned citizen of Evanston, I have already begun to help offset GHG emissions by organizing To Rescue Evanston Elms, and working to implement the successful elm tree inoculation program that began in 2005.  Since that time Evanston has reduced the number of elm trees contracting Dutch elm disease from a high of 6.33% in 2004 to just 1.86% in 2008.  This translates in to preserving approximately 800-1000 trees.  As alderman, I will support the adoption of a tree preservation ordinance to prevent unnecessary tree removal and will promote the use of native plants for new construction and adaptive reuse of older buildings.

3        Green Alley Program

Evanston implemented a pilot Green Alley Program in 2008.  I am very interested in extending this program.  The largest expense in the Streets division is grading unpaved alleys.  Outside of the pilot program, the only option for paving alleys is using concrete with drainage, which is expensive, and the least sustainable alternative.  I will advocate for using more recycled and permeable paving materials.  When using Federal money, I would encourage the use of porous concrete with a middle trench to allow storm water to be cleaned and recharged instead of being directed to the sewer.

4.        What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

The City’s policies should promote sustainability and establish standards for environmentally responsible development.  The Environment Board’s proposal for a Green Building Ordinance will be a large step toward meeting the goals of the ECAP.  I will work for legislation that requires or provides incentives for existing buildings that achieve LEED-EB status.  For City buildings or City funded projects that are more than 10,000 sq ft, I will support legislation that requires a minimum of LEED Silver for new construction or rehabilitation.

survey reply from Michael Drennan, 9th ward

1.      Where do countering climate change and achieving sustainability rank among your priorities as major issues/problems facing Evanston?

I entered the race to champion the Climate Action Plan.  We need to stop filing away energy efficiency, alternative transport, “greener” buildings and construction techniques and recycling under “environment.”  Too often they are then left to languish in favor of more politically or fiscally expedient solutions.  Our relationship with the environment must enter the everday discourse that constitutes city government.  This city has promised to uphold its end of the Agreement on Climate Change and I plan, with your help, to make it do just that.

2.  What do you regard as the most important initiatives in the Evanston Climate Action Plan adopted by the Council last November?  What do you think are the biggest challenges to achieving the Plan’s overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 13% below the current level by 2012?

It saddens me that, after so many years so few people, especially the young, have taken to heart the simple message of reduce, reuse and recycle.  There is little awareness of ones own personal responsibility for climate change, much less our collective responsibility.  We need to reach out and include all the community in this journey towards sustainability; educate to empower their own involvement; and involve those so empowered to join organizations like CGE, contribute to the Climate Action Fund, and help the community at large.

Above and beyond communication and outreach efforts, the city can partner with other municipalities, public service agencies and the private sector to promote solutions.  This may begin at a modest level; working with CEDA to assist income qualified households with weatherization efforts, or Com Ed to increase participation in its energy efficiency programs for example.  But it also means using city clout with the 20 big businesses in Evanston to benchmark their own journeys through either Chicago Climate Exchange or EPA Climate Leaders.  At a point on the horizon we’ll need the courage and patience to ask for the assistance of several states and Ontario in crafting our own wind farm.

The city can and should take unilateral action as well to begin its own journey towards sustainability.  It can manage its own fleet more effectively; render in its renovation an energy efficient civic center and Crown Recreation Center, and build LEED Silver for new construction projects, reconsider its water contract with Skokie and ensure our waste hauling contract with Groot makes recycling its central focus.

Long have we heard how sustainability efforts are too expensive in the near term, too onerous to conduct, and difficult to contract for.  With the city facing unfunded pension liabilities close to $150 million now wouldn’t seem the best time to consider revamping the city fleet for hybrid vehicles.  But if not now, when?  To me it seems apparent the city should start with the ‘low hanging fruit’ embedded in the plan (taxes for plastic and paper, collect data on traffic patterns, enforce anti-idling ordinance etc.) and as success accrues, work toward larger goals (EcoPass with RTA).  It also requires us to start the educational dialogue with city departments and committees necessary for achieving broad based consent and unified action.  Organizational culture between different committees can vary considerably.  We will need to identify common points of interest specific to those groups either consonant to or already part of the Climate Action Plan, while also providing more general education on our journey towards sustainability.

3.  What do you see as the appropriate role for city government in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the whole community?  How would you use the resources of the City government and your office to promote implementation of the Climate Action Plan?

Carolyn Callopy did an excellent job presenting a final draft of the Climate Action Plan to the city council last May.  She edited it somewhat, and while I would keep her language, I might add some action verbs.  She suggests the City can “explore” private/public partnerships, “encourage” city businesses to “consider” sustainable options and “empower” residents to make a difference.  I heartily agree with her.  Evanston will benefit most when it partners to find and develop opportunities, and educates on alternatives and options.

However I feel the city does more than simply advise its residents.  It crafts and reviews zoning codes and building ordinances, defines standards, regulates industries and individuals for the common good, mandates policy change, and taxes to balance the public good with the public budget.  In the end it defines the tone of an administration, and sets the parameters for city managers to take action.  These verbs, “reviews, crafts, defines, regulates, mandates, taxes” belong in parts of the action plan.

4. What is your position on the Evanston Environment Board’s proposed legislation requiring LEED certification for new buildings?

I like it, and would pass it pending clarification of the use of “performance bonds” and an assurance of its application to buildings of ten thousand square feet.

The four mayoral candidates will speak on the Economy at BooCoo Cafe, 7:00-9:00 pm on March 31. BooCoo Cafe is located at 1823 Church Street. Parking is available in the lot across the street.